|
> Summary >
Agenda
POSTPONED UNTIL FURTHER NOTICE
THE SEVENTH MANSFIELD PACIFIC RETREAT
SEPTEMBER 19-22, 2004
WHITEFISH, MONTANA
Clean Energy Alternatives in the Asia-Pacific: Can
Hydrogen Provide a Sustainable Future?
Energy supply is undoubtedly a critical issue for
industries, communities and governments in both the
developed and developing world. The U.S. Department
of Energy’s International Energy Outlook 2003
shows a precipitous growth in worldwide energy demand
over the next 24 years. According to the report, total
world energy consumption is expected to expand by 58
percent from 404 quadrillion BTUs in 2001 to 640 quadrillion
BTUs in 2025. The report also projects that the consumption
of every primary energy source will increase dramatically
over the 24-year forecast horizon.
Many see a movement to a hydrogen economy as the long-term
solution to the environmental and energy problems associated
with fossil fuels. Due to its abundance, suitability
to store and transport energy generated from renewable
sources, and non-polluting nature, hydrogen is often
cited as the panacea for global energy problems.
In November 2003, representatives from 14 countries
including the United States, China, Japan, and Korea
signed the International Partnership for the Hydrogen
Economy (IPHE) agreement, pointing to hydrogen as a
key contributor to energy supply and environmental
protection in the foreseeable future. Japan’s
R&D annual budget for fuel cells and hydrogen has
tripled since 1995, reaching $200 million in 2002.
Other countries including China and South Korea either
have R&D programs in place, or are expanding their
investments. The United States
has announced a five-year $1.7 billion program on hydrogen,
fuel cells and related infrastructures, and the U.S.
Department of Energy's fiscal year 2005 budget of $24.3
billion (the largest ever) includes $22.8 million for
the department's hydrogen programs.
As hydrogen-based technologies show promise and attract
increased interest, there are questions about how the
nations of the Pacific Rim might solve the region’s
complex and pressing energy and environmental problems.
Any transition to a hydrogen economy calls for careful
consideration of technological advances, infrastructure
requirements, economic and political implications,
and policies that encourage the development and deployment
of this technology.
What are the medium-term energy policy incentives
for the Asia-Pacific region? Does hydrogen have the
potential to provide clean, alternative energy to the
region in the near future? Can the problems of extracting
hydrogen be solved in a pollution free, cost-effective
manner? What barriers exist to the successful implementation
of hydrogen-based approaches? And what types of regional
approaches and R&D collaboration might be developed?
Program Overview
To answer these and other questions, the Maureen
and Mike Mansfield Foundation and the Mansfield
Center
at the University of Montana will hold the Seventh
Mansfield Pacific Retreat entitled: Clean
Energy Alternatives in the Asia-Pacific: Can Hydrogen
Provide a Sustainable Future? The Retreat will
take place
September 19-22, 2004, at the Kandahar Lodge in
Whitefish, Montana.
Retreat participants will consist of an interdisciplinary
group of 20-25 experts representing government, academia,
industry and NGOs from Japan, South Korea, the People’s
Republic of China and the United States.
The Retreat agenda will focus on:
·
An overview of hydrogen-based energy systems and their
potential to provide a sustainable future in the Asia-Pacific
region.
·
Identification of energy challenges in the Asia-Pacific
region that would benefit from hydrogen-based technologies.
·
Discussion of the economic, political and policy implications
of adopting hydrogen-based technologies.
·
Exploration of how hydrogen-based technologies might
be applied to address pan-Asian issues and contribute
to environmental protection.
While there will be presentations from participants
from each country represented at the Retreat, the Retreat
agenda will depart from a standard conference format
by allocating at least half the time for informal discussion
and exchanges among participants. Participants in past
Retreats have rated these informal discussions as the
most valuable aspect of the meeting because they allow
for in-depth discussion and exchanges of perspectives
not possible in larger groups or conference formats.
Past Retreats have also demonstrated that these discussions
lay the groundwork for subsequent networking, exchanges
of information and future intra-regional cooperation.
|