YOMIURI SHIMBUN JANUARY 2007 OPINION
POLLS (P07-5)
Yomiuri Shimbun January 2007 Opinion Polls
Dates Conducted
January 20 and 21, 2007
Released
Publishing date not available
Copyright
Yomiuri Shimbun 2007
Methodology
Yomiuri conducted the poll in individual interviews on January
20 and 21 using a stratified two-stage random sample of 3,000
voters
in 250 different locations. 1,780 people, or 59.3% of those selected,
responded.
Key Issues
•
Japan Defense Agency upgrade to Ministry of Defense and new Self-Defense
Force priorities
•
Support for Abe Cabinet
•
Patriotism incorporated in the new basic education law
•
Arrest of some governors for bid-rigging and bribery
Background
Starting in January 2007, the status of the Japan Defense Agency
was raised to that of a full-fledged ministry: the Ministry of
Defense. Although the change of status does not have a direct
impact on the security policymaking of Japan, it represents a
further
acceptance of defense-related issues in the Japanese polity.
Also around this time, the new basic education law, which incorporates
some moral points such as the spirit of patriotism and respect
for culture, tradition and public spirit, was enacted. The law
sparked controversy because, as some argued, it was forcibly
enacted
without sufficient discussion about what those moral points actually
mean and to what extent the government should dictate those points.
Finally, in January, Japanese media focused on bid-rigging and
bribery charges leveled at the governors of Fukushima, Wakayama
and Miyazaki.
Link to Original Source
Data received directly from Yomiuri Shimbun
Disclaimer
The Mansfield Foundation is responsible for the translation of
this Yomiuri poll, subject to the Mansfield
Foundation Terms
of Use
Survey:
Q1. Do you support or not support the Abe Cabinet?
Support
48.4% (55.9)
Do not support
38.9% (30.0)
Other
4.4% (3.5)
Do not know; No answer
8.3% (10.6)
Figures in parentheses are results from polls conducted in December,
2006.
SQ1. [Those who answered “support” in Q1 only]
Positively evaluate its political stance
27.4%
Feel that it is stable
10.2%
Can trust the Prime Minister
25.0%
Have a fresh image of the Prime Minister
48.8%
Can support its economic policies
3.1%
Can support its foreign policy
18.2%
Because of the coalition between the Liberal Democratic Party
and the NewKomeitoParty
8.9%
It is better than previous cabinets
8.0%
Other; Do not know; No answer
5.0%
Please select from the list below up to two reasons why you support
the Abe Cabinet:
SQ2. [Those who answered “do not support” to Q1 only]
Cannot positively evaluate its political stance
40.3%
Do not feel that the cabinet is stable
30.0%
Cannot trust the Prime Minister
24.4%
The Prime Minister's political experience is lacking
19.8%
Cannot support the administration's economic policies
23.1%
Cannot support the administration's foreign policy
10.4%
Because of the coalition between the Liberal Democratic Party
and the NewKomeitoParty
11.4%
The current cabinet is worse than the previous ones
8.4%
Other; Do not know; No answer
4.9%
Please select from the list below up to two reasons why you do
not support the Abe Cabinet:
Q2. From the list below, please select all applicable issues you
would like the Abe Cabinet to prioritize and tackle.
Economic conditions/job security
53.7% (52.0)
Financial reconstruction
20.7% (19.0)
Tax reform and the issue of consumption tax
32.0% (31.8)
Social security reform including pension and healthcare
63.0% (59.3)
Support for child care and counter-measures for declining birthrates
28.9% (29.9)
Education reform
25.3% (26.7)
Administrative reform such as cutting back government employees
20.3% (18.6)
Problems of income disparities
26.2% (21.1)
Issues surrounding Yasukuni Shrine
6.1% (6.2)
Diplomacy toward Asia, including China and South Korea
14.6% (16.5)
Issues overNorth Korea
31.3% (33.6)
National defense and security
11.5% (10.7)
Constitutional reform
7.0% (5.8)
Disaster prevention and crisis management
10.6% (8.9)
Measures for preventing crimes and securing peace and order
21.7% (20.2)
Environmental protection
16.6% (14.1)
Food safety
17.6% (11.6)
Other; Nothing special; Do not know; No answer
2.8% (2.7)
Figures in parentheses are results from polls conducted in December,
2006.
Q3. Which political party do you support right now? Please select
one:
Liberal Democratic Party
39.3% (40.8)
Democratic Party ofJapan
12.5% (11.7)
NewKomeitoParty
2.5% (2.7)
JapanCommunist Party
2.1% (1.2)
Social Democratic Party ofJapan
1.3% (1.0)
The People's New Party
0.2% (---)
The New PartyNippon
0.1% (---)
Others
0.1% (0.1)
Do not support any party
41.5% (41.7)
Do not know; No answer
0.6% (0.9)
Figures in parentheses are results from polls conducted in December,
2006.
Q4. Are you interested in current politics or not?
Greatly interested
29.7% (31.5)
Somewhat interested
46.3% (45.6)
Not interested very much
19.8% (17.7)
Not interested at all
3.8% (4.9)
Do not know; No answer
0.4% (0.2)
Figures in parentheses are results from polls conducted in January,
2006.
Q5. So far, the Japan Self-Defense Force has worked on activities
such as national defense, disaster restoration in Japan or overseas,
international peacekeeping operations abroad, etc. As a whole,
do you support these SDF activities or not?
Greatly support
33.7%
Somewhat support
48.5%
Do not support very much
11.1%
Do not support at all
3.8%
Do not know; No answer
2.9%
Q6. The Japan Defense Agency was raised to the status of the Ministry
of Defense on January 9. Do you support this or not?
Greatly support
16.3%
Somewhat support
29.4%
Do not support very much
27.8%
Do not support at all
11.4%
Do not know; No answer
15.0%
Q7. Along with the change of the Ministry of Defense, some responsibilities
of the SDF that were regarded as subordinate, such as international
peacekeeping operations and the evacuation of Japanese nationals
in the case of emergencies abroad, have been upgraded to primary
responsibilities equivalent to national defense. Do you support this
or not?
Greatly support
25.4%
Somewhat support
37.2%
Do not support very much
21.1%
Do not support at all
7.2%
Do not know; No answer
9.0%
Q8. Do you think the Japanese people as a whole have a strong feeling
of love for their own country? Or is the feeling of love for their
own country weak?
Strong
15.7%
If anything, strong
23.3%
If anything, weak
33.6%
Weak
24.8%
Do not know; No answer
2.6%
Q9. The revised basic education law took effect last December. Under
this new education law, the spirit of patriotism is incorporated
as stated: “to respect tradition and culture, and love the
nation which has cultivated them, and to nurture the attitude of
respect for other nations and contribute to international peace and
development”. Do you support the fact that the spirit of patriotism
was incorporated in the law, or not?
Greatly support
27.5%
Somewhat support
39.1%
Do not support very much
21.3%
Do not support at all
7.5%
Do not know; No answer
4.6%
Q10. In addition to the above, the new basic education law clearly
states the responsibility of parents and respect for the public spirit.
As a whole, do you support the new basic education law?
Greatly support
31.1%
Somewhat support
43.8%
Do not support very much
14.6%
Do not support at all
3.9%
Do not know; No answer
6.6%
Q11. Are you interested in the politics and the public administration
of the prefecture where you currently live?
Greatly interested
29.9%
Somewhat interested
41.8%
Not interested very much
22.4%
Not interested at all
5.0%
Do not know; No answer
1.0%
Q12. Let us ask you about the governor of the prefecture you currently
live in. (Those in Miyazaki Prefecture are not asked this question.)
S1. Right now do you trust the current governor, or not?
Greatly trust
13.7%
Somewhat trust
44.0%
Do not trust very much
27.3%
Do not trust at all
8.0%
Do not know; No answer
7.0%
S2. Do you think the current governor reflects the residents’ opinions
regarding actual public administration, or not?
Greatly reflects
5.7%
Somewhat reflects
39.1%
Does not reflect very much
31.8%
Does not reflect at all
9.2%
Do not know; No answer
14.2%
S3. Do you think that the current governor fully explains to residents
about the management of public administration, or not?
Fully explains
5.1%
Explains to some extent
29.7%
Does not explain very much
41.5%
Does not explain at all
15.5%
Do not know; No answer
8.2%
Q13. Previous governors in Fukushima, Wakayama, and Miyazaki were
arrested for bid-rigging or bribery cases over public works. After
this series of scandals, as a whole, has your degree of trust toward
the governor been lowered, or has it remained the same?
Has been very much lowered
30.6%
Has been a little bit lowered
33.8%
Remains the same
34.3%
Do not know; No answer
1.3%
Q14. As a background for triggering those scandals, if there are
any problems you see as especially serious, please select as many
as you like from the list below:
The governor has much power (budget, personnel matters, etc.)
31.7%
It costs a lot of money for a governor's election
23.9%
The Assembly is not playing a role of a checking institution
to the administrative body
38.3%
Public information is not open enough
32.5%
Local government employees are having a close relationship
with the companies that are involved in public works through
re-reemployment with them
59.6%
There is a problem in the bidding system to decide the companies
that can work on the public works
34.6%
The punishment against illegal acts is weak
34.2%
Voters do not pay attention to public management on daily basis
22.1%
The same governor gets elected for many terms
31.0%
There is a problem in the governor's qualification and political
stance
22.1%
Other
0.6%
Nothing special
3.5%
Do not know; No answer
2.1%
Q15. After a series of scandals, the Association of Governors has
been working to prevent it from happening again. In regard to the
three measures below, please answer whether or not it is effective
to prevent it from happening again.
S1. Do you think it is effective to let more companies participate
in general bidding over public works?
Effective
44.9%
Somewhat effective
31.0%
If anything, not effective
9.1%
Not effective
9.2%
Do not know; No answer
5.8%
S2. How about establishing a system where illegal acts by the governor
or the officials in management can be internally reported?
Effective
58.2%
Somewhat effective
26.3%
If anything, not effective
6.6%
Not effective
4.9%
Do not know; No answer
3.9%
S3. How about regulating the practice where local government employees
are hired by companies that they regulate or to which they are closely
connected?
Effective
63.8%
Somewhat effective
22.8%
If anything, not effective
5.4%
Not effective
4.6%
Do not know; No answer
3.4%
Q16. Do you think the governor in the prefecture you live in is
actively working to avoid those scandals happening again, or not?
(People in Miyazaki prefecture are not asked about this question.)
Do think so
24.3%
Do not think so
30.2%
Cannot say which
36.4%
Do not know; No answer
9.1%
Q17. In general, up to how many terms do you think it is appropriate
for a governor to serve? Please select one from the list below:
Up to 1 term (4 years)
18.5%
Up to 2 terms (8 years)
47.2%
Up to 3 terms (12 years)
18.2%
Up to 4 terms (16 years)
1.1%
Up to 5 terms (20 years)
---
Other
0.6%
No special limit
11.6%
Do not know; No answer
2.7%
Q18. Do you think there should be a guideline to limit the number
of times the same governor gets elected, or not?
Do think so
59.4%
Do not think so
18.1%
Cannot say which
21.0%
Do not know; No answer
1.5%
Q19. What do you think are the qualifications specially needed for
a governor? Please select as many as you like from the list below:
Experience and career
29.5%
Connection with the central government
23.1%
Willingness to make reforms actively
38.7%
Leadership
60.6%
Ability to coordinate
24.4%
Vitality
59.6%
Good ideas
24.7%
Cleanness
37.5%
Friendliness
18.7%
Others
0.6%
Nothing special
2.8%
Do not know; No answer
0.8%
Fundamental Characteristics of Survey Sample:
Regional Distribution
Hokkaido, Tohoku
11.7%
Kanto
30.1%
Chubu
19.1%
Kinki
17.6%
Chugoku,Shikoku
9.3%
Kyushu
12.2%
City Scale
Large Metropolitan areas (Tokyo's 23 wards and ordinance designated
cities)
22.4%
Large mid-sized cities (cities with population over 300,000)
18.7%
Mid-sized cities (cities with population over 100,000)
23.6%
Small cities (cities with population under 100,000)
23.5%
Towns and villages
11.8%
The scale is based on the standards set up as of November 1, 2006