Contact Us Search our Site Home Page
The Maureen and Mike Mansfield Foundation
Japanese site About the Foundation About Maureen and Mike Mansfield Mansfield Fellowships Foundation Programs Publications and Outreach Support the Foundation
 

About the Foundation

 

Our Mission

 

Mansfield Foundation Board

 

Mansfield Foundation Staff

 

Foundation Financials

 

Foundation Biennial Reports

 

Internship Opportunities

 

About Maureen &
Mike Mansfield

 

Maureen Hayes Mansfield Bio

 

Mike Mansfield Bio

 

Mike Mansfield Quotes

 

Centennial 2003

 

 

 

Mike Mansfield: In His Own Voice

 

Cooperation and Understanding
U.S.-Japan Relations
U.S.-Asia Relations
U.S.-China Relations
U.S.-Korea
Cross-Strait Relations
The Role of the President in Foreign Policy

Message to Future Generations


Cooperation and Understanding


“… knowledge is essential for acceptance and understanding. By examining the political heritage, the economic experience and even the national myths that tie people together; by exploring the cultural, religious, and social forces that have molded a nation, we can begin to better understand each other and contribute to the knowledge and understanding that will strengthen our ties of friendship and lead to a better world.”
Mike Mansfield

 

 

“Our country has always taken too much for granted; and let other countries come to learn about us and our diversities, but we haven’t been too keen on learning about others…. And one of the best ways to bring about better understanding is through exchanges of all kinds.”
Mike Mansfield, 1984

 

Back to Top

 

 

U.S.-Japan Relations

 

‘The U.S.-Japan relationship is the most important bilateral relationship in the world, bar none.’ I started using this description in the early 1980’s….In fact, my remark was inspired by my experience with the U.S.-Japan relationship that dates back before World War II….At that time, the importance of Japan was linked, in a sense to the fact that Japan was a barrier against communism in Asia.

 

In the 1970’s, the U.S. understanding of Japan’s importance evolved to some extent. The change was triggered by the new approach toward Asia adopted by the Nixon administration as a result of the end of the Vietnam War and the normalization of U.S.-China relations…In May 1981, after the U.S.-Japan summit meeting, President Ronald Reagan and Prime Minister Zenko Suzuki announced that their relationship was changed to that of allies. But, the use of the word ‘allies’ met with some criticism because it seemed to emphasize the security component of the U.S.-Japan relationship during the Cold War.

 

Especially in Japan, people were concerned by such an evolution toward greater emphasis on military aspects of the U.S.-Japan relationship. As the U.S. ambassador to Japan, I was very much aware of the Japanese people’s concern. I began using the phrase ‘the most important bilateral relationship in the world’ because it combined economic interdependence and security cooperation….The fact that both countries were superpowers, economically speaking, and the fact that both nations had a security agreement showed us that the U.S.-Japan relationship was the cornerstone of stability in the Far East and in the world, bar none….

 

I don’t know how long it’s going to last, though, because you have China on the horizon….China will become more powerful in the decades to come. So far, China has held its head above water better than Japan has and, in doing so, China has become something of a stabilizing factor in East Asia and in the rest of the world….China could be in a position to threaten Japan’s supremacy in Asia. That is the major reason for me to emphasize that it is essential for Japan to rebuild its economy quickly.

 

Mike Mansfield: My Recollections. Interviews with Mike Mansfield, published by Nihon Keizai Shimbun, Inc., 1999, pp. 89-92.

 

Back to Top

 


U.S.-Asia Relations

A people, whether in Asia or in the Americas, can preserve their independence only if they have it in the first place and if they are willing to fight to keep it. Beyond this initial responsibility, which every nation must accept, nations can combine among themselves for a joint defense of freedom….I make the following suggestions without in any sense regarding them as immutable. I make them with a full awareness of their imperfections and their inadequacies. I hope they will be challenged, debated, discussed, and improved, but I make them now in the hope that they will help to put up the guideposts that are so urgently needed.

 

First. Colonialism – Chinese Communist of any other – has no place in Asia, and the policies of the United States should in no way perpetuate it.
Second. The United States should look with favor on governments in Asia which are representative of their people and responsive to their needs, but this nation should not intervene in the internal affairs of any peaceful country.
Third. The defense of freedom in Asia must rest in the first instance on the will and determination of the free peoples of that region.
Fourth. Systems of alliances for the defense of free nations in Asia against aggression must draw their primary and preponderant strength from the Asian Countries; the association of the United States, if any at all, with such alliances should be indirect, through the machinery of ANZUS [Australia, New Zealand, U.S. security treaty] or similar combinations of non-Asian countries.
Fifth. The United Nations should serve as the only worldwide marshalling center for resistance, in the event of aggression or threat of aggression in Asia.
Sixth. The economic development of the nations of Asia is preponderantly the responsibility of the peoples of that region, to be pursued in accord with their individual national genius and objectives; any assistance rendered by this country, whether directly or through the United Nations or other agencies, should be peripheral and should be rendered only when genuinely desired.

Mike Mansfield, July 8, 1954, in a speech to the U.S. Senate. This speech followed the Geneva Conference in 1954 during which 19 nations met to settle affairs in Southeast Asia. Mansfield and many other Senators opposed U.S. participation in the conference until some common-front position could be established among non-Communist nations.

 

Back to Top

 


U.S.-China Relations
#1

 

We must awaken from our lethargy about the Orient and put the manifest sympathy of the American people to a practical use. We must realize just how much we need China, not how much China needs us….We must not forget our future lies, in large part, in the Pacific. A friendly and strong China will be a safeguard for us in that area. Let us recognize the situation as it really exists and do our share to keep China going so that American lives will be spared and the war shortened considerably.
Mike Mansfield, October 20, 1943, in a speech during his first year in Congress while World War II was being fought in Asia. From his ten years of teaching at the University of Montana, Mansfield brought to Congress his expertise and interest in Asia, as well as an affectionate regard for the Asian people.

 

Back to Top

 

#2

 

There is immense potential danger in China; but there is also an immense potential danger in every other powerful nation in a world which has not yet learned how to maintain civilized survival in a nuclear age except on the razor’s edge. …The fundamental question for us is not whether it is a danger, real or potential. The fundamental question is whether our present policies act to alleviate or to exacerbate the danger. Do we forestall the danger by jousting with the shadows and suspicions of the past? Do we help by a continuance in policies which do little if anything to lift the heavy curtain of mutual ignorance and hostility?

 

Like it or not, the present Chinese government is here to stay. Like it or not, China is a major power in Asia….Is it, therefore, in this nation’s interest and in the interest of world peace to put aside, once and for all, what have been the persistent but futile attempts to isolate China? Is it, therefore, in this nation’s interest and in the interest of world peace to try conscientiously and consistently to do whatever we can do – and, admittedly, it is not much – to reshape the relationship with the Chinese along more constructive and stable lines?…

 

I must say that the deepening of the conflict in Vietnam makes more difficult adjustments in policies respecting China….It is not easy to contemplate an alleviation with any nation which cheers on those who are engaged in inflicting casualties on Americans. Yet, it may well be that this alleviation is an essential aspect of ending the war and, hence, American casualties. That consideration alone, it seems to me, makes desirable initiatives toward China at this time.
Mike Mansfield, quote from the inaugural lecture of the Mansfield Lectures in International Relations, March 29, 1968. Mansfield chose China as the subject for this lecture, which called for a major new direction in American foreign policy in Asia. This call was ultimately heeded by the U.S. State Department and White House, and in 1972, Mansfield visited the People’s Republic of China on the invitation of Premier Chou-En-lai.

 

Back to Top

 


U.S.-Korea

American diplomatic relations with Korea from 1866…to 1910, when Korea was annexed to Japan, can be said to have been influenced very little by political or commercial considerations. Our main reason for seeking relations with Korea was primarily to secure a treaty dealing with the relief of shipwrecked vessels on the coast of that country….In 1904, Roosevelt showed more interest in China than in Korea although Korea was the country most vitally affected by the Russo-Japanese War. The American State Department, from 1882 to 1907, consistently refused to be bothered when called upon by Korea under the treaty of 1882. Furthermore, the withdrawal of the American Minister-Resident to Korea in 1905 showed that the American Government was content to let Japan go ahead with her projected annexation without a protest of any sort. The policy of the United States has been to ignore the obligations incurred by treaty and a desire to avoid any complications which might grow our of said obligations. After all, we had no imperialistic designs in Korea; we had no class clamoring for a commercial or political foothold; we had no real and vital interests in that country; therefore, the treaty of 1882 notwithstanding, we had no business there. Thus, we departed and left Korea to her fate.
Mike Mansfield, 1934, from his master’s thesis, University of Montana

 

Back to Top

 

 

Cross-Strait Relations

Perhaps the most important element in the rebuilding of stable relations with China is to be found in a solution of the problem of Taiwan. It may help to come to grips with this issue if it is understood at the outset that the island of Taiwan is Chinese. That is the position of the National Government of the Republic of China. That is the position of the People’s Republic of China. For a quarter of a century, this common Chinese position has been reinforced by the policies and actions of the United States government. Since that is the case, I do not believe that a solution to the Taiwan question is facilitated by its statement in terms of a two-China policy….The fact is that there is one China which happens to have been divided into two parts by events which occurred a long time ago.

 

Is there not, then some better way to confront his problem than threat-and-counter-threat between island Chinese and mainland Chinese? Is there not some better way to live with this situation than by the armed truce which depends, in the last analysis, on the continued presence of the U.S. 7th Fleet in the Taiwan straits

 

The questions cannot be answered until all involved are prepared to take a fresh look at the situation. It seems to me that it might be helpful if there could be, among the Chinese themselves, an examination of the possibilities of improving the climate. As I have already indicated, the proper framework for any such consideration would be an acceptance of the contention of both Chinese groups – that there is only one China and Taiwan is a part of it.
Mike Mansfield, quote from the inaugural lecture of the Mansfield Lectures in International Relations, March 29, 1968. Mansfield chose China as the subject for this lecture, which called for a major new direction in American foreign policy in Asia. This call was ultimately heeded by the U.S. State Department and White House, and in 1972, Mansfield visited the People’s Republic of China on the invitation of Premier Chou-En-lai.

 

Back to Top

 

 

The Role of the President in Foreign Policy

 

Let me…clarify one point: the conflict in Vietnam cannot be settled from the Congress or from the campus. In the end, if it is to be settled honorably, there is only one Constitutional officer who can speak for you and for the entire nation in its foreign affairs. Whether we agree with him or not, whether we like him or not, whether we abhor him or love him, that man is the President of the United States. In a government such as ours, a Senator lives with a Constitution, a constituency, and a conscience. All three considerations underlie the suggestions respecting Vietnam which have been made here today and which have been expressed on other occasions. President Johnson and all the Presidents who have gone before him have listened to advice from many sources, including the Senate.

 

It is the President who makes the fundamental decisions of foreign policy. These decisions are of an immensity which enjoins upon us all a high respect for the burdens which a President must bear, and a responsibility to tender to him every support which can be given in good conscience.

Mike Mansfield, from an address to the University of North Carolina Forum, March 13, 1967, during which Mansfield pointed out that U.S. policies toward Europe and China were some 20 years out of date and that U.S. failure to explore every possible avenue with the United Nations towards peace in Vietnam might be responsible for the war there.

 

Back to Top

 

 

Message to Future Generations

 

We are living in a fast changing world. You are young enough to keep up with it. You are living in a world that is shrinking, the globe is becoming a neighborhood. It’s going to shrink further still. We’re going to become closer neighbors still. We are going to have to understand each other better. And we’ll have to recognize that regardless of where we come from, no matter what our color or background, we all initially sprang from the same source.

 

We’ll have to learn to get along with one another. We’ll have to be more aware of responsibilities which go with this rapidly speeding up world. We’ll have to set examples for those who will follow us and recognize that we don’t know it all. So we should listen to the other person, and that other person sometimes is right and sometimes we are wrong. It will be a matter of accommodation and compromise, knowledge and understanding.

 

I have no doubt that future generations will be able to cope with events as they occur no matter how rapidly, if for no other reason than they have no choice. And as we could cope and our predecessors could, you can cope too. And I wish you well. I hope you’ll devote your efforts to preserving the environment, preserving the rights guaranteed to all under the First Amendment, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion, Freedom of Assembly and Freedom of the Press. I hope you will not violate any of those rights because there are limitations.

 

You haven’t been given much of a legacy, but you have been given a great challenge and what you do will determine what your successors will be. So I wish you all good luck and, as the Asians usually say, good health, good fortune, much happiness, and a long life.

Mike Mansfield, in a message to American Youth, November 1989.

 

Back to Top

 

 

About the Foundation | Asian Opinion Polls | Mansfield Fellowships
Foundation Programs
| Publications & Outreach | Support the Foundation
Contact Us | Search Site | Home Page


© 2005-2009 The Maureen and Mike Mansfield Foundation